<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>rustylongdotcom &#187; pedestrian bridge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/tag/pedestrian-bridge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rustylong.com/blog</link>
	<description>Architecture, Photography, Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 17:44:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cary&#8217;s Pedestrian Bridge Art is up</title>
		<link>http://www.rustylong.com/blog/2008/10/carys-pedestrian-bridge-art-is-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rustylong.com/blog/2008/10/carys-pedestrian-bridge-art-is-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 02:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rusty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedestrian bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[town of cary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rustylong.com/blog/?p=396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But is it any good?

I myself am having a hard time coming to a decision on the piece. Some think that $165,000 is too much for an important piece of public art, but instead I&#8217;m wondering about the timing and implementation of this piece. Was the bridge designed without the artwork in mind? What kind [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>But is it any good?</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Cary's 1/64 Pedestrian Bridge" rel="lightbox[bridgeart]" href="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/bridge4.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-402" title="bridge4" src="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/bridge4.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="250" /></a><a title="Vine Art Detail" rel="lightbox[bridgeart]" href="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/bridge0.jpg"></a><a title="Vine Art Detail - Closer" rel="lightbox[bridgeart]" href="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/bridge2.jpg"></a></p>
<p>I myself am having a hard time coming to a decision on the piece. Some think that <a href="http://www.townofcary.org/depts/prdept/parks/64bridge.htm">$165,000</a> is too much for an important piece of public art, but instead I&#8217;m wondering about the timing and implementation of this piece. Was <a href="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/2008/07/evening-constitutional/#comment-375">the bridge</a> designed without the artwork in mind? What kind of results would we have had if the three artists were brought on board earlier, working in a more integral way with the bridge designers? (And while we&#8217;re on the subject&#8230; Why don&#8217;t people appreciate the intrinsic beauty of a bridge itself anymore?)<span id="more-396"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="The Iron Bridge - 1779" rel="lightbox[bridgeart]" href="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/ironbridge.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-411" title="ironbridge" src="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/ironbridge.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="372" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Okay, comparing a pedestrian bridge in Cary, North Carolina to one of the most <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Iron_Bridge">important structures</a> in the industrial revolution isn&#8217;t really fair&#8230; However, it is fair (I think) to compare Cary&#8217;s attempts at civic art to Raleigh&#8217;s projects. Case in point, the shimmer wall on <a href="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/2008/09/raleigh-wide-open-convention-center-opening/">the new convention center</a>. Surely a good Architect teamed up with a talented Artist could have come up with a more integral sculpture, allowing the art to feel less applied?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Convention Center's Shimmer Wall" rel="lightbox[bridgeart]" href="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/convention_exterior01.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-412" title="convention_exterior01" src="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/convention_exterior01.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="334" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I&#8217;m afraid the answer is, &#8220;Yes, but not for under $156,000.&#8221; Hopefully the three pieces to be integrated into the new <a href="http://www.townofcary.org/depts/prdept/parks/walnutpark.htm">Walnut Street Park</a> will <em>really</em> be something to write about.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Walnut Street Park - Master Plan" rel="lightbox[bridgeart]" href="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/walnutstparkfinal.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-413" title="walnutstparkfinal" src="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/walnutstparkfinal.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="671" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rustylong.com/blog/2008/10/carys-pedestrian-bridge-art-is-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evening Constitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.rustylong.com/blog/2008/07/evening-constitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rustylong.com/blog/2008/07/evening-constitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rusty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedestrian bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stutz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rustylong.com/blog/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Julie and I took the wee-one on a walk yesterday after work as a non-television way to bring our day to a close. As many of you may or may not know, one of the key factors in choosing to buy our house was pedestrian access. We wanted a house within walking distance of basic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a rel="lightbox[pedbridge]" href="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/pedbridge_thumb.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-170" title="pedbridge_thumb" src="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/pedbridge_thumb.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="231" /></a><a rel="lightbox[pedbridge]" href="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/pedbridge_1.jpg"></a><a rel="lightbox[pedbridge]" href="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/pedbridge_2.jpg"></a><a rel="lightbox[pedbridge]" href="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/pedbridge_3.jpg"></a><a rel="lightbox[pedbridge]" href="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/pedbridge_4.jpg"></a><a rel="lightbox[pedbridge]" href="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/pedbridge_5.jpg"></a><a rel="lightbox[pedbridge]" href="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/pedbridge_6.jpg"></a><a rel="lightbox[pedbridge]" href="http://www.rustylong.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/pedbridge_7.jpg"></a></p>
<p>Julie and I took the wee-one on a walk yesterday after work as a non-television way to bring our day to a close. As many of you may or may not know, one of the key factors in choosing to buy our house was pedestrian access. We wanted a house within walking distance of basic grocery shopping, a park, etc. I was also especially excited about the proposed <a href="http://www.townofcary.org/depts/prdept/parks/64bridge.htm">pedestrian bridge</a> over US1/64.</p>
<p>The bridge is now open, and there is now a debate about what piece of public art the Town of Cary will be tying into this bridge. The proposed vine sculpture by <a href="http://www.stutzart.com/portfolio.html">Mike Stutz</a> isn&#8217;t exactly what I&#8217;d hoped for&#8230; too literal for my tastes, but after all this <em><strong>is</strong></em> Cary. I find the alternate artist <a href="http://www.judybales.com/public_art/index.php">Judy Bales</a> much more compelling, but still am dissatisfied with the fact that all the big competitors for this installation weren&#8217;t local.</p>
<p>With the <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=art+raleigh&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a">multitude of artists</a> in Cary, Raleigh, and Durham I find it hard to believe that there wasn&#8217;t a better choice, closer to home for this project. Alas, we shall see what comes of it. I feel that the bridge is already rather photogenic, so hopefully whatever Stutz has planned, it won&#8217;t completely conceal the beauty of the structure itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rustylong.com/blog/2008/07/evening-constitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
